“The primary cause of disease is in us, always in us.”
Introduction: The Jewish Connection
It was merely a few decades prior to the 1918 pandemic when the rivalry between two of the preeminent microbiologists in modern history, Louis Pasteur and Antoine Béchamp, reached its apex. The Frenchman Pasteur is considered the chief proponent of the seemingly infallible germ theory, which forms the crux of modern medicine. The theory was very controversial when it was first proposed—rightfully so, I might add, despite the widespread claims of its “validity.”
According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, germ theory is defined as “the theory that certain diseases are caused by the invasion of the body by microorganisms, organisms too small to be seen except through a microscope.” Note how it is still referred to as a “theory” after all this time, despite being widely accepted as “fact.”
Dissecting Pasteur’s career in detail would probably require an entire book; however, that is not necessary to understand the fundamental fraud. Once you dig deep enough, a pervasive pattern starts to emerge. As I’ve already done the heavy lifting for you, I will break it down very simply in this article.
Pasteur is renowned for his “discoveries” of vaccination, fermentation, and pasteurization. He is also credited with “disproving” the doctrine of spontaneous generation, which is the notion that living organisms can arise from nonliving matter.
Oddly enough, Pasteur’s research was largely inspired by the central text of Rabbinic Judaism, the Talmud. He was motivated by a passage that said, “a person bitten by a mad dog should be fed a lobe of that dog’s liver,” according to a bizarre article in The Algemeiner, a Jewish-oriented newspaper from New York City. As if the article itself wasn’t baffling enough, it was appropriately titled “How Coronavirus Makes This Rosh Hashanah More Meaningful.”
“Louis Pasteur reportedly read a French translation of a tractate of Talmud Yoma, saying that a person bitten by a mad dog should be fed a lobe of that dog’s liver. According to one claim, this quote fascinated Pasteur, who began experiments that ended in his discovery that using a bit of an infection could set off an alarm within the body that caused it to produce antibodies to fight the disease.”
Further inspection reveals the specific passage referred to in the above article as Yoma 84b, which is provided below, courtesy of Sefaria.
Don’t forget that the Talmud is the same text that permits Jews to lie to gentiles (non-Jews), as indicated in the rabbinical discussion below (Bava Kamma 131a:21). This is an extremely serious matter, considering allopathic medicine is almost entirely built upon these very same principles: deceitfulness and fraud.
Pasteur’s reported interest in the Talmud is very peculiar; I suspect his fascination with such a nefarious text may have been much deeper than reported. However, delving deep into that rabbit hole would probably require an article of its own. Nevertheless, since we’re on the subject of this notoriously sinister book, there’s no harm in exploring this connection just a bit further.
A recent article from The Jewish Press entitled “Louis Pasteur: The Jewish Connection” by Saul Jay Singer, a senior legal ethics counsel at the DC Bar and “collector of extraordinary original Judaica documents and letters,” highlights the fundamental connection between Pasteur and Judaism:
“Also less known is the fact that Pasteur owes his greatest discoveries to a chance reading of the Talmud, which, 1,500 years before he was born, actually advanced the notion that the administration of a weak form of a disease to humans could cause immunity to its virulent version.
The story begins with Rabbi Dr. Israel Michel Rabinowitz (1818-93), a Russo-French translator, essayist, and author of Hebrew, Polish, French, and Latin Grammars. The descendant of a long line of rabbis, he pursued his rabbinical studies in Grodno and Brest and, after earning his semicha, studied Greek and Latin and entered the University of Breslau, where he studied philology and medicine.
He went to Paris in 1854 to complete his medical studies, served there as a hospital intern, and earned his M.D. in 1865, but he never practiced medicine.”
Rabbi Rabinowitz was the first person to translate portions of the Talmud into French, which made him famous. These translations were incorporated into various books that he wrote, such as Civil Law of the Talmud and Medicine in the Talmud and Talmudic Principles of Ritual Slaughter and Treif from the Medicinal Point of View. He also added his own commentaries alongside the translations. However, his most integral book for this discussion was Mevo She’arim (“An Entry to the Gates”), published after his death in 1894.
Rabinowitz was good friends with Pasteur. While living in Paris, he showed Pasteur his translation of the Talmudic Order Mo’ed, which is about Jewish festivals. Pasteur was fascinated by the rabbinical discussion on page 83b of Tractate Yoma, “where the rabbis accurately describe the five signs of a rabid dog: open mouth, dripping saliva, tail between paws, abnormal gait, and droopy ears.”
Pasteur was allegedly inspired by the rabbis’ ancient Hebrew “wisdom.” Specifically, he found their prescribed cure for a person bitten by a rabid dog enlightening. The Talmudic rabbis indicate that the “infected” person should eat the lobe of that dog’s liver. Pasteur interpreted this as follows: The way to cure infectious ailments was to give the infected person small amounts of the infection itself. This was apparently the initial seed that sprouted and paved the way for the normalization of vaccines.
How Pasteur “Verified” the Rabbinical “Wisdom” in the Talmud
Pasteur tested his theory by cultivating weakened cholera bacteria in chicken broth. He then fed this broth to a sample of chickens. Afterwards, he was unable to infect the chickens with fresh bacteria, and therefore concluded that the weakened cholera had rendered them “immune” to the disease.
However, this sounds like an incredibly crude experiment that doesn’t follow the scientific method. There could be a variety of reasons as to why Pasteur was unable to infect the chickens with fresh bacteria—maybe because “infection” doesn’t even exist at all, at least not in the way that we’re told.
Pasteur referred to his artificially weakened bacteria as a “vaccine.” His next application of this “immunization” method was an attempt to prevent anthrax, which was a feared killer of cattle. Purportedly, anthrax can be fatal to humans who encounter “infected” animals or contaminated animal products.
Pasteur grew bacteria from the blood of animals that he thought were infected with the disease and injected another sample of animals with this so-called vaccine. He claimed that the bacteria was the cause of the disease, although once again this is highly questionable due to the sloppy and crude nature of the experiment. Other factors that were unaccounted for could have easily contaminated the experiment and caused the symptoms instead.
Pasteur was informed about dead sheep “infected” with anthrax being buried in fields. He hypothesized that the anthrax from these dead sheep was being spread by earthworms, which is a highly questionable claim. Further experiments apparently showed that the anthrax bacteria was present in the earthworms’ excrement.
He subsequently instructed farmers to avoid burying dead animals in fields, which supposedly led to a reduction in the spread of anthrax. At first glance, however, there are so many glaring flaws and lack of controlled studies here that it’s simply futile to use it as conclusive evidence of anything.
Pasteur next turned his focus toward developing a rabies vaccine. He supposedly “grew” the virus in rabbits, and then “weakened” it by drying the affected nerve tissue, which sounds like quite the heinous experiment. Pasteur then suspended the spinal cords of these rabbits in jars to expose them to the air in a moisture-free environment, before injecting “contaminated” dogs with these spinal fluid preparations.
However, keep in mind that there is no conclusive evidence indicating that these dogs were in any way afflicted with a “viral infection” that matched the virus that was supposedly “grown” in another creature (rabbits). Are you starting to see just how ridiculous this is?
The dogs reportedly didn’t develop rabies after receiving these so-called “vaccines,” but that still isn’t a clear indicator that the experiment worked. There are so many pitfalls with this experiment that it’s hard to even know where to begin—but if you can understand why, quickly and intuitively, then you are on the right path as far as understanding the fraudulent nature of modern medicine.
Regardless, after their fabricated “success” with this poorly-designed experiment, Pasteur and his colleagues proceeded to use their rabbit spinal cord fluid preparation on a human guinea pig. A nine-year-old boy named Joseph Meister came to visit Pasteur’s laboratory in 1885. He had allegedly been bitten fourteen times by a rabid dog. Over a ten-day period, the boy received 13 injections of the rabbit spinal fluid preparations.
Meister didn’t develop the disease, but this outcome still isn’t concrete proof that Pasteur’s immunization technique worked. In this case, the “vaccination” was used to supposedly combat a theoretical “virus” that had entered Meister’s body after being bitten by a rabid dog; this is a bit different from how vaccines are used today.
Vaccines are traditionally administered as a preventative measure, before a person has gotten sick with a “virus.” Their stated goal is to prevent sickness altogether by introducing a weakened virus, bacteria, or antigen into the body, which supposedly triggers an immune response. Needless to say, not a single vaccine is any good at achieving that goal.
There could be a number of reasons as to why Meister didn’t get the disease, namely the fact that whatever “rabies” is has never been proven to be caused by a “contagious” pathogen. Moreover, it is entirely possible that the disease was mischaracterized due to symptoms that overlap with another condition.
The Pasteur Institute Was Lavishly Funded by Jewish Philanthropists
Despite the sloppy science and poor experimental design, news of Pasteur’s “success” eventually spread around the world, leading to a sudden influx of patients who had been bitten by “rabid” dogs. As a result, Pasteur decided to create a research and teaching center that would primarily focus on vaccination against rabies.
Singer’s article in The Jewish Press further describes the funding of this institution. In 1887, Pasteur gathered leading scientists from various microbiological disciplines to begin worldwide fundraising for the development of the Pasteur Institute, with the purpose of “the treatment of rabies according to the method developed by M. Pasteur,” as well as “the study of virulent and contagious diseases.”
The facility’s construction was financed by “national subscriptions and private donations,” although further inspection reveals that there were many noteworthy Jewish donors. It also included an apartment and research laboratory exclusively for Pasteur.
The Pasteur Institute was inaugurated in Paris on November 14, 1888. Around 600 people attended the inauguration ceremonies, which included notable figures such as Russian Emperor Alexander III, Brazilian Emperor Pedro II, French President Sadi Carnot, and French prime minister Charles Floquet.
Everywhere you look, the fingerprints of wealthy and influential Jews are all over Pasteur’s career, which served as the launchpad for the modern-day pharmaceutical industry. A number of Jewish patrons were involved in financing the Pasteur Institute, which is highly suspect. One of these was Cécile Furtado-Heine (1821-96), who came from a Sephardic family.
Furtado-Heine was a French Jewish philanthropist with famous ties. In 1838, she married a Frankfurt banker by the name of Charles Heine, who tragically died in 1865. Upon her husband’s death, she inherited a massive fortune and started engaging in philanthropy. She supported numerous charitable works, including the Red Cross, as well as various Jewish charities—another massive red flag.
Furdato-Heine also financed the building of several synagogues in France. Parisian Grand Rabbi Zadok Kahn stated that she should be on the list of “most virtuous” Jewish women of all time. She was so notable that after her death in 1896, French President Felix Faure was present at her mourning ceremony.
Another significant Jewish figure who financed the Pasteur Institute was Daniel Iffla-Osiris (1825-1907), who was born to a Jewish family with Moroccan origins. He became wealthy after investing in the Spanish railways and bequeathed a large portion of his wealth to the Pasteur Institute—36 million gold francs, to be exact, making him the largest donor in history.
Like Furtado-Heine, Iffla-Osiris also built a number of synagogues in Paris, including the Buffault Synagogue in Paris. Interestingly, he was a collector of Egyptian relics and a student of archaeology. Apparently this influenced him to change his name from Iffla to Iffla-Osiris, in a reference to the Egyptian god of the underworld.
The Pasteur Institute started to open facilities in various countries in 1891. Today there are 32 institutes spread across 29 countries. Notably, one of these branches was founded in Jerusalem in 1913 by a young Zionist physician named Leo (Aryeh) Boem. He dubbed it The Pasteur Institute for Health, Medicine, and Biology in Palestine.
Dr. Boem immigrated to Israel from Russia and “commenced operations with the support of the World Zionist Organization,” per The Jewish Press. Singer’s article continues:
“Boem’s ambition was to establish the Institute consistent with Zionist aspirations to develop a national entity incorporating a strong scientific foundation. The importance of a biological lab in Eretz Yisrael found expression even in early discussions at the Zionist Congresses; in fact, Professor Steineck – a character in Herzl’s novel Altneuland (1902) – was head of a bacteriological laboratory modeled after those of the Parisian Pasteur Institute.
The Pasteur Institute (Boem adopted the name without the knowledge of the original entity in Paris) was part of a health complex that included a mother-and-child health center operated by Hadassah and sponsored by noted Jewish philanthropist Nathan Strauss. Notwithstanding complications created by the British Mandate Authority, it performed standard microbiological activities, including the production of cholera, smallpox, and rabies vaccines for the population of Eretz Yisrael (which were also used by the Ottoman military forces).
In 1928, chafing under the British Administration, it claimed independence and was increasingly denied support by the British Department of Health in Eretz Yisrael.”
The main observation here is that the Pasteur Institute had strong ties to Judaism and Zionism. Thus, it’s reasonable to conclude that the organization is nothing more than an elitist lab for the research and creation of biological weapons for genocide. Make no mistake about it: The Pasteur Institute is undoubtedly a terrorist organization hiding under the umbrella of a “private non-profit foundation” working for the “good” of humanity. The ones who loudly claim to be “noble” often have the darkest intentions.
The modern-day pharmaceutical industry was founded on unscientific principles from rabbinical discussions in the Talmud. The direct link between Pasteur’s research and Judaism is undeniable. It is no wonder, then, as to why we have backwards and archaic nonsense like vaccines still being implemented to this day. The fact that this direct link has barely been investigated up until now has led to inordinate suffering for all mankind. This cannot be tolerated moving forward.
Pasteur Committed Unethical and Plagiarizing Fraud
As if the Jewish connection wasn’t bad enough, Pasteur was also exposed as an unethical and plagiarizing fraud who stole ideas from other scientists, including his chief rival, Béchamp. Pasteur told his family to keep his laboratory notebooks secret and never reveal them to anyone. However, his request was only honored until the 1970s, when his last male descendant gave the notebooks to the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris, making them available to scholars.
Gerald L. Geison, a history professor at Princeton and leading Pasteur scholar, subsequently managed to unearth multiple examples of scientific misconduct from Pasteur’s notebooks. Geison found that Pasteur often manipulated data to fit his own preconceived ideas. He indicated that Pasteur would “not have passed muster with Congress.”
Geison and also noted that Pasteur was “not a very appealing human being.” In fact, none other than The Washington Post published an article entitled “Louis Pasteur and Questions of Fraud” in 1993 to report on Geison’s findings. The article states:
“Geison noted that Pasteur’s notebooks revealed that he had regularly ‘massaged’ or manipulated raw data in order to fit his own preconceived ideas. This conforms, he said, with other historical studies that have shown that even among prominent scientists ‘there are always discrepancies between the private record and published results.'”
Regarding one of Pasteur’s most celebrated achievements—his public demonstration of an anthrax vaccine on sheep at Pouilly-le-Fort, France, in 1881—The Washington Post continues:
“‘Pasteur deliberately deceived the public and scientific community about the precise nature of the vaccine he used,’ said Geison, calling it a ‘clear case of scientific misconduct . . . He knew full well he was lying.'”
Let’s proceed to examine this “achievement” in more detail, since it proves to be quite insightful about the overall validity of his research. A profound book entitled “The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur,” written by R.B. Pearson, describes this event.
“It seems to me that we have now seen too many cases of deceitfulness, prevarication and deliberate fraud on Pasteur’s part to place much confidence in his good faith under such conditions, and in fact one is justified in looking with suspicion on this experiment. Here were 48 sheep – 24 supposed to be vaccinated, lived, while 24 not vaccinated, died. In such a number the treatment might be differentiated quite easily. He could have injected the unvaccinated sheep with a slow poison and he might have used pure sterile water, or a syringe with a perforated piston, in a pretended injection of the vaccinated sheep! And his assistants might have believed such a trick harmless and justifiable! Or it might have been concealed from them!”
While the secretive Pasteur managed to deceive the public and the scientific community regarding the “efficacy” of his anthrax vaccine, that same “efficacy” could not be replicated in future tests conducted by other parties. Paul de Kruif describes this event in his book Microbe Hunters:
“Gradually, hardly a year after the miracle of Pouilly-le-Fort, it began to be evident that Pasteur, though a most original microbe hunter, was not an infallible god. Disturbing letters began to pile up on his desk; complaints from Montpotheir and a dozen towns of France, and from Packisch and Kapuvar in Hungary. Sheep were dying from anthrax – not natural anthrax they had picked up in dangerous fields, but anthrax they had got from those vaccines that were meant to save them! From other places came sinister stories of how the vaccines had failed to work – the vaccine had been paid for, whole flocks of sheep had been injected, the farmers had gone to bed breathing ‘Thank God for our great man Pasteur,’ only to wake up in the morning to find their fields littered with the carcasses of dead sheep, and these sheep – which ought to have been immune – had died from the lurking anthrax spores that lay in their fields.
Pasteur began to hate opening his letters, he wanted to stop his ears against snickers that sounded from around corners, and then – the worst thing that could possibly happen – came a cold, terribly exact, scientific report from the laboratory of that nasty little German Koch in Berlin, and this report ripped the practicalness of the anthrax vaccine to tatters. Pasteur knew that Koch was the most accurate microbe hunter in the world!”
De Kruif, however, seems to have been a Pasteur apologist, as was Geison. These types usually make an admission that much of Pasteur’s research doesn’t stand up to scrutiny, while inexplicably defending his reputation and insinuating that his overall results were still “valid.” De Kruif goes on to make the following ludicrous assertion in his book:
“What a searcher this Pasteur was, and yet how little of that fine selfless candour of Socrates or Rabelais is to be found in him. But he is not in any way to be blamed for that, for while Socrates and Rabelais were only looking for truth, Pasteur’s work carried him more and more into the frantic business of saving lives, and in this matter, truth is not of the first importance.
In 1882, while his desk was loaded with reports of disasters, Pasteur went to Geneva, and there before the cream of disease-fighters of the world, he gave a thrilling speech, with the subject: How to guard living creatures from virulent maladies by injecting them with weakened microbes.”
Really? Truth is “not of the first importance” when it comes to the “frantic business of saving lives”? Any buffoon can conclude that the exact opposite is true: Truth is of the utmost importance when it comes to saving lives. To disregard truth in such a matter is highly questionable, if not outright unethical and/or criminal. Interestingly, the Sanitary Commission of the Hungarian Government reported the following about the anthrax inoculations in 1881 (from Pearson’s book):
“The worst diseases, pneumonia, catarrhal fever, etc., have exclusively struck down the animals subjected to injection. It follows from this that the Pasteur inoculation tends to accelerate the action of certain latent diseases and to hasten the mortal issue of other grave affections.”
There you have it. The man who popularized the cornerstone of modern medicine wasn’t as infallible as you’ve been led to believe. As the vaccine failed their tests, the Hungarian Government banned it from their country. This is yet another example of the highly dubious nature of Pasteur’s work in general. Pearson continues in “The Dream and Lie of Louis Pasteur”:
“It was not long before his vaccine was proven a failure elsewhere as well. In March 1882, a commission composed of members of the faculty of the University of Turin, Italy, undertook to conduct tests regarding the value of this anthrax prophylactic. A sheep having died of anthrax, after the learned professors had vaccinated some other sheep with Pasteur’s cultures, they inoculated both these vaccinated sheep and some unvaccinated sheep with the blood of the dead sheep. All of the sheep, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, subsequently died, proving the vaccine utterly worthless.”
Considering Pasteur’s “groundbreaking” public demonstration of his anthrax vaccine apparently helped pave the way for modern medicine and pharmacology, it’s reasonable to conclude that these industries are on extremely shaky ground, to put it mildly. It’s hard to stomach the fact that this is the type of “research” that forms the foundation of modern medicine. What a mess.
Nevertheless, this is not meant to be a comprehensive review of Pasteur’s career by any means. It is only meant to provide you a glimpse into the prominent Jewish influences that inspired his many so-called “achievements.”
An Introduction to Antoine Béchamp
Now onto Antoine Béchamp, a maestro of microbiology who you probably never learned about at any point during your state-sanctioned “education.” It’s safe to say that Béchamp, who was Pasteur’s fellow Frenchman and bitter rival, didn’t incorporate anything resembling the dark ideas in the Talmud into his own work. His experimental procedures were far more scientific and rigorous in nature than anything Pasteur ever did.
Despite this, it was the sick fraud Pasteur who ultimately became a “rock star” thanks to his allegedly stronger debating skills and [elite] connections, while the forgotten genius Béchamp was relegated to the dustbin of history. Béchamp’s ideas weren’t profitable for the corrupt pharmaceutical industry. Thus, they were ignored and suppressed over time. The Bioregulatory Medicine Institute (BRMI), which supports the science of self-healing, notes that Béchamp was also an inventor who developed “several useful commercial inventions”:
“In 1852, he created an inexpensive industrial process to produce aniline by the reduction of nitrobenzene with iron fillings and acetic acid. This method greatly contributed to the emergence of the synthetic dye industry. For this work, along with others, he was awarded the Daniel Dollfus Prize of the Societe Industrielle de Mulhouse in 1864. He also synthesized the organic derivative of arsenic, p-aminophenylarsonate, which was subsequently used in the treatment of trypanosomiasis.”
Béchamp earned a Doctor of Science in 1853, and his doctoral thesis examined how albuminoids, which are proteinaceous materials, can form urea through oxidation with potassium permanganate. He was able to discover many complex compounds that his predecessors had failed to identify (since they utilized more standard analytical methods). Béchamp skillfully used the optical activity of albuminoid substances to distinguish these compounds.
Béchamp also earned a Doctorate in Medicine in 1856, adding to his stellar academic credentials. He assumed a position at the University of Montpellier, where he remained until 1876; however, his time here was littered with disputes with none other than Louis Pasteur. At one point, Béchamp’s work was placed in the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, which means that it was banned by the Roman Catholic Church.
He proposed the idea that living entities called “microzymas,” or “tiny enzymes,” create bacteria as a response to host and environmental factors. This is known as terrain theory (also called host theory or cellular theory). In terrain theory, germs are a byproduct of the disease; they are not the cause of the disease themselves.
This is in stark contrast to the unproven idea of germs as infectious agents that invade a host and cause specific diseases entirely on their own. Are you starting to see how something like this can easily be twisted into a monstrous deception for the profit and gain of a small group of wealthy [elites]?
Béchamp claimed that microzymas could produce both enzymes and cells. Additionally, he indicated that under favorable conditions, these microzymas could evolve into multicellular organisms. He denied that bacteria could single-handedly cause disease by invading a healthy organism.
Instead, he theorized that poor host and environmental conditions lead to a destabilization of the host’s native microzymas. Once the host’s native microzymas are destabilized, they proceed to decompose host tissue via the creation of “pathogenic” bacteria, which essentially operate like scavengers.
Béchamp believed that a process similar to fermentation led to disease and sickness. He argued that disease and sickness resulted from an imbalance in the body’s internal terrain. Thus, he emphasized the environment in which the germs lived, rather than the germs themselves.
If the terrain is balanced, i.e., homeostatic, germs cannot thrive. However, if the terrain is imbalanced, germs will flourish. The key idea here is that the germs are generated from within the body itself—not coming from the outside environment.
Another way to put it is that Béchamp believed “germs were actually the chemical byproducts and the degenerative aspects of the unbalanced state of a body,” according to a well-intentioned but slightly misleading blog post by Darin Olien (co-host of the Netflix docu-series, Down to Earth with Zac Efron).
Béchamp’s terrain theory is objectively much more sound than Pasteur’s irrational and fear-inducing germ theory. A superb article by Dr. Robert O. Young in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, titled “Who Had Their Finger on the Magic of Life — Antoine Béchamp or Louis Pasteur?” describes the unfortunate circumstances surrounding the suppression of Béchamp’s ideas over time. The following passages probably best summarize the situation at large:
“The adoption by science of Louis Pasteur’s germ theory as the whole truth, without regard to the subtleties and deep insight of Bechamp’s1 microzymian principle, represents one paraphrased: ‘There is no medical doctrine as potentially dangerous as a partial truth implemented as whole truth.’ Any medical professional, bioscientist, health care practitioner, or lay person for that matter, who wishes to gain insight into the origins and nature of infectious and chronic illness, against the backdrop of a marvelous view of the life process, must consider Bechamp. And they must entertain one of the most important concepts to come out of his illustrious career-microbiological pleomorphism as it relates to disease and its symptoms.
…
Also perversely awe-inspiring is the fact that a person of Bechamp’s1 extraordinary accomplishments has been written out of history books, textbooks and all encyclopedias. It is sobering to consider the required degree of authoritarian control over key academic elements in our culture. It is not my intention to belabor the politics, but as the wonders of Bechamp’s work unfold to the mind, the question simply arises, ‘Why is this not common knowledge?’ Yet, we must be grateful that his ‘erasure’ was far from complete.”
We will also do our part to ensure that Béchamp’s “erasure” never reaches fruition. The “powerful controllers,” as Dr. Young refers to them, will ultimately regret not completely wiping the history books clean of any mention of Béchamp—a sloppy mistake. [Their] arrogance, of course, knows no bounds. Dr. Young goes on to describe several main principles behind why Béchamp “had his ‘finger’ on the magic of life.”
- The air contains microscopic organisms capable of fermenting any suitable medium on which they land.
- An independently living micro anatomical element exists in the cells and fluids of all organisms, which precedes life at the cellular and genetic levels, and is the foundational unit of all biological organization.
- The principle of pleomorphism: Microzymas regularly transform into what we refer to as bacteria, and bacteria can revert or devolve back into the microzymian state. This is fundamental to understanding the true nature of “infectious” disease symptoms that manifest in the body.
- Atmospheric germs are not fundamental species like other life forms; rather, they are either microzymas or their evolutionary forms. These germs have been “set free from their former vegetable or animal habitat by the death of that ‘medium.'” Béchamp stated: “The microzyma is at the beginning and end of all organization. It is the fundamental anatomical element whereby the cellules, the tissues, the organs, the whole of an organism are constituted.”
The most shocking of these principles is #2: the independently living micro anatomical element that exists in the cells and fluids of all organisms. This is the microzyma. Béchamp concluded that microzymas were the “builders and destroyers of cells,” embodying constructive/destructive activity and purpose. However, as far as disease is concerned, it is the destructive aspect that is of interest.
Béchamp discovered that these microzymas always remained after a dead organism was completely decomposed; in other words, “they are the only non-transitory biological elements.” His findings demonstrated that microzymas either carry out decomposition by themselves or they are the precursors of beings that carry it out, namely bacteria, viruses, yeasts, and fungi.
His underlying philosophy on disease certainly makes a lot more sense than Pasteur’s reckless and deranged ideas derived from the Talmud. Béchamp’s theories are also easy to put into practice, and they render allopathic medicine largely useless, as Big Pharma and the mainstream medical cartel cannot profit from an individual with a healthy “terrain,” or tissue quality.
Conclusion: Opt Out of Future “Pandemics”
Instead of killing germs, which are merely the byproducts of disease and not the cause of the disease itself, Béchamp advocated cultivating good health through factors within a person’s control, such as diet, hygiene, and exercise. If a person has good “terrain,” then disease will not manifest. In a situation like this, I can emphatically say that ignorance is not bliss (something the general public needs to figure out sooner rather than later).
Unfortunately, it was the wrong side that ultimately won out, with the fraudulent germ theory becoming the cornerstone of modern medicine and disease treatment. Pasteur even plagiarized from Béchamp’s work—among others—adding more insult to injury throughout their long and bitter rivalry, which mostly centered around what was the true cause of illness.
Dr. Young highlights the fact that it was Pasteur’s “superficial dogma” that prevailed over Béchamp’s findings. This is even more objectionable considering Béchamp’s meticulous documentation and presentation, as well as the prolific nature of his research.
It is lamentable that monstrous corruption and fraud, which has been deceitfully packaged as “benevolence” by a violent supranational cabal, form the basis of modern medicine and pharmacology. This has had a needlessly devastating impact on humanity for over a century.
To make matters worse, Pasteur allegedly recanted germ theory on his deathbed, stating, “The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything.” However, this quote is originally attributed to physiologist Claude Bernard, a contemporary of Pasteur. If true, it certainly collapses the shaky house of cards known as “modern” medicine.
Nonetheless, your primary takeaway from this article should be that the COVID “pandemic” we just experienced was entirely built upon fraud and deception. It’s time to unlearn the lies of mainstream medicine and learn about the tremendous self-healing powers of the human body. You can take back control of your health from the thugs who want you weak, sick, and dependent on them. You can choose to opt out of “pandemics” for good.
There is no benefit to continue going down this path of insanity when there exists an overwhelming mountain of evidence exposing the vaccine industry as pure fraud, evil, and corruption. Not a single vaccine serves any useful purpose at all. They are only used to weaken, harm, and kill, all while turning people into lifelong slaves of Big Pharma and the medical industry.
If the masses don’t soon figure out that germ theory has never been scientifically proven—not to mention the fact that it originates from rabbinic babble in ancient Jewish text—then they can expect to be manipulated and coerced into accepting “pandemics” indefinitely on behalf of the wonderful and benevolent institutions like the CDC, WHO, et al., that of course have no ulterior motives or conflicts of interest whatsoever.
Of course, irrespective of whether or not viruses are real, the sinister intentions and egregious government intrusion and overreach—one bordering on maniacal obsession—should have been apparent to anyone who was even remotely paying attention during the COVID “pandemic.” That makes it all the more alarming that so many simply complied with the entire charade.
The mass compliance was incredibly jarring, to say the least—but that’s a discussion for another day. I for one refuse to allow my life to be dictated by such egregious junk science that doesn’t even remotely come close to following rigorous scientific procedure, let alone replicating real world phenomena.
Excellent!